|
|
|||
|
titolo |
LONDON DIALOGUES |
|
editore |
SKIRA |
||
anno |
2012 |
||
|
|
||
lingua |
INGLESE |
||
|
|
||
Titolo originale:
London Dialogues – Serpentine Gallery 24-Hour Interview Marathon |
|||
|
|||
Contents |
|||
|
The authors interviewed 56 people coming from a wide
range of topics and subjects. They focused on the city of London interviewing
people who knewed had something in common with the city. The main purpose is
to identify bridges between art-design-architecture because there is no need
to actually be busy defining the borders between things. |
||
|
|||
Giudizio
Complessivo: 7 (scala 1-10) |
|||
Scheda compilata da: Pietro Rosso |
|||
Corso di Architettura e Composizione Architettonica 3
a.a.2014/2015 |
|||
Koolhaas Ulrich Obrist |
Authors: Ulrich Obrist & Koolhaas |
||
Remment Lucas
"Rem" Koolhaas (born 17 November 1944) is a Dutch architect, architectural theorist,
urbanist and Professor in Practice of Architecture and Urban Design at the
Graduate School of Design at Harvard University. Koolhaas studied at the
Architectural Association School of Architecture in London and at Cornell
University in Ithaca, New York. Koolhaas is the founding partner of OMA. In
2000, Rem Koolhaas won the Pritzker Prize. Hans-Ulrich Obrist (born 1968) is an art curator, critic and
historian of art. He is Co-director of Exhibitions and Programmes and
Director of International Projects at the Serpentine Gallery, London. Obrist
is the author of The Interview Project, an extensive ongoing project
of interviews. He is also co-editor of the Cahiers d'art revue. |
|||
|
|||
List of interviews |
|||
Abake Kenneth Adam David Adjaye Tariq Ali Ron Arad Shumon Basar Anat Ben-David Adam Caruso Hussein Chalayan Michael Clarck Peter Cook Mark Cousins Marcus du Sautoy Paul Elliman Tony Elliott Brian Eno Pedro Ferreira Sophie Fiennes Ryan Gander |
Ant Genn Gilbert & George Jonathan Glancey Zaha Hadid Richard Hamilton Ussell Haswell Susan Hiller Roger Hiorns Damien Hirst Chales Jencks Isaac Julien Patrick Keiller Jude Kelly Hanif Kureishi Scott Lash Doris Lessing Ken Loach Hautam Malkani Doreen Massey |
Tom
McCarthy Gustav
Metzger Mary
Midgley Markus
Miessen Chantal
Mouffe Tim Newburn Tim O’Toole Julia
Peyton-Jones Olivia
Plender Milan Rai Peter
Saville Yinka
Shonibare MBE Iain
Sinclair Squarepusher
aka Tom Jenkins Marina
Warner Eyal Weizman Richard
Wentworth Jane and
Louise Wilson Cerith Wyn Evans |
|
|
|||
Common questions |
|||
-
what are your toolboxes? -
Who have
somehow been a toolbox for you? -
Any unrealised projects? -
Do You have
any dream for the city of London? -
Can you somehow
map the city of London? -
Is there
such a thing as a theory of the city? -
When did
you first become related to the city of London? -
Can you
explain your current moment in relation to your whole practice? -
Is there
anything you wanted to build in London? |
|||
|
|||
Scheme of a
standard interview |
|||
-
discussion
about the last project of the interviewed -
explanation
of the first relationships with the city -
projects
realised in the city / for the city -
understanding
a possible map of the city -
personal idea of the city -
discussion
about some more projects of the interviewed -
thoughts
and ideas for London in future -
unrealised projects or dreams |
|||
|
|||
Zaha Hadid
interview – main topics |
|||
Can you tell
us what’s your contemporary idea of London? I still feel it is a very exciting city because it is so
impredictable. Maybe it is more predictable than before but every time you
think you know it well, something comes along and surprises you. And I think
that also shifts your opinion abaout what you might do there, constantly. So
in that sense, it’s still a kind of educational situation for me. I think
your career is at a very interesting moment where you have to decide whether
to repeat things or whether to continue to innovate. I am in a position
now where I can do both, there are things you can use as a generic
project, but there’s still an excitement about inventing things. I can give
you the example of the MAXXI in Rome, ten year of endless work not winning a
single competition gave us an incredible opportunity providing us with an
enormous repertoire that allowed us to invent. It allowed us to rely on our
own experience and previous inventions to move on to the next project. I
don’t think you have to reinvent the wheel all the time. What is
your feeling about entering, as an Arab, the Arab world at his moment of
maximum Westernisation? I think that that part of the world is now living in a
combination of extreme Westernisation and a pride Arab identity, I think that
the effect od Arabness coincides with certain interests right now in terms of
the whole landscape project, which is related with dunes and stuff like that.
There is aldo interest in pixelation and geometry which relates a great deal
to the Arab identity in terms of algebra, geometry and mathematics. It is
suddenly possible to connect in terms of materials and ideas. |
|||
Can you
tell us about your last project in Beirut? In Beirut we had to plan a bank headquarter and a building
for the AUB (American University of Beirut), against my original idea they adapted the idea of a
perimeter block, which is not really apporpriate for the city since it is not
Berlin. Instead of making a thousand blocks the made five, so the scale is
weird, by doing that they made Beirut a tabula rasa – into one flat plane –
even though the city was much more layered. And they did not have common
discourses about complexity and different ways of dealing with urban renewal.
Can you
explain us your studio’s transition from being almost a miniaturist to a kind
of hypermodern and contemporary organisation and how you manage big works
with few people? I resisted digitisation for a very long time, as you
well know the most important trick is to delegate. You know from early on you can’t do everything yourself,
you can do bits of it yourself, you can make people do things the way you
want them done, but you have to rely also on their own invention and their
own challeng and abilities. I think that teamwork has been very important to
me for a long time. I have always believed in it and that is why it is
manageable. There are
equally, two periods of your life, one when you are honoured and a previous
one whne you were neglected, can you tell something about this process? When I was neglected or ignored I always thought thai it
would be a passing phase. I am fundamentally an optimist, I don’t neither
take the acclaim too seriously now, it doesn’t really affects my life. Can you
explain us how you asses the current moment right now in the world and how
you see it? For me it’s a very interesting moment. However, it’s
still very difficult for women to operate as professionals. There are still
worlds you have no access to, in practice, I still offer resistance all the
time, and I think that keeps you on the go. It’s not that I am there and
everybody says yes to me, it’s still a struggle, despite having gone through
it a hundred times. It’s not necessarily always great but I think it keeps
you in place, and it also makes you think about things in a different way. Do you
think there is such a theory about London? The old theory about London is always about a city which
is made of many villages that merged and created areas of dendity and a metropolitan
condition. I think all the new development is very hard-handed and not as
light as it could be. It is still a fortified city: I feel that the main
focus is still on the urban perimeter block, and this is also something that
could be cahnged. I was
wondering if you have any dream projects for London or any unrealised
projects you would like to see happen. London always inspires projects that are unpredictable,
look at the Olympics site. I still think this projects are possible, there is
an obsession here about making everything look nice orfeel nice, but niceness
is not appropiate in London because the city relies on a slight messiness. If
it were possible to do a project which is non so even clear, it would be mor
einteresting than this idea |
|||
|
|||
Book’s Pros and Cons |
|||
All the interviews relate to very time-specific topics,
there are not many topics that could be taken as general or as a theory for
the interviewed. All the interviews take as given the person’s story/art/style/work.
The people come from a very wide range of arts and culture, the book gives a
very colorfull portrait of London culture. |
|||